In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900F is slightly slower than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $353 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 67% cheaper – $176.90 vs $529.90
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.04 vs $3.13/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
33%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
33%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$176.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
