In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i9-13900E is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 15% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 172 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
125 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
95%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
83%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
