In Control, the Core i9-13900E is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 255 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 9 months and 12 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 9 months and 12 days newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
87%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
