In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900E is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i7-8700T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i7-8700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i7-8700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
