In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i9-13900E is faster than the Core i5-8500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 119 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Core i5-8500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i5-8500T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
99 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
81%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i5-8500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i5-8500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-8500T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-8500T Apr 2nd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
