In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-13900E is slightly slower than the Core i3-6100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-6100
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 229 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
