In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i9-13900E is quite a bit faster than the Core i3-4000M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-13900E
- Up to 27% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 119 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4000M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4000M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900E vs Core i3-4000M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900E Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Sep 4th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG3 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
