In Control, the Core i9-13900 is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $255 more expensive!
Core i9-13900
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 51% cheaper – $245.00 vs $499.99
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Control – $0.98 vs $1.96/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
49%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
50%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
