Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 216 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $207.95 vs $501.80
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900 - $1.09 vs $2.32 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $501.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$207.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $207.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |