The Core i9-13900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-3250, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $437.41 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-3250
- Up to 83% cheaper – $90.00 vs $527.41
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Core i9-13900 vs Core i3-3250 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, $
$527.41
17%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
22%
Core i9-13900 vs Core i3-3250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i3-3250 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs Core i3-3250 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $138.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |