In Deathloop, the Core i9-12900T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900T
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 232 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900T vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900T vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900T vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900T
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900T Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $489.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
