In Deathloop, the Core i9-12900KF is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1260L. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 236 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900KF vs Xeon E3-1260L: Comparison of performance and price
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900KF vs Xeon E3-1260L in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900KF vs Xeon E3-1260L in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
