In Rust, the Core i9-12900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 278 vs 267 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Nov 04, 2021
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
80%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $564.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
