In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-12900K is slightly slower than the FX-8150 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $239 more expensive!
Core i9-12900K
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
FX-8150
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 82% cheaper – $51.29 vs $290.64
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.21 vs $1.35/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900K vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
214 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
88%
Price, $
$290.64
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
16%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900K vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900K vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
