In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-12900K is slower than the FX-6100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $257 more expensive!
Core i9-12900K
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
FX-6100
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 88% cheaper – $33.90 vs $290.64
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.16 vs $1.71/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900K vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
82%
Price, $
$290.64
11%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
9%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900K vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900K vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
