In Atomfall, the Core i9-12900K is faster than the Core i7-2860QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900K vs Core i7-2860QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$293.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900K vs Core i7-2860QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900K vs Core i7-2860QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-2860QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
69%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2860QM Sep 4th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Released | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
