In Atomfall, the Core i9-12900HX is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900HX
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs May 10, 2022
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900HX vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900HX
May 10th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
88%
L3 Cache
24 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900HX May 10th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 10th, 2022 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $606.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1964 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
