Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 3600 - 324 vs 300 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $93.99 vs $359.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-12900F - $0.31 vs $1.11 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
324
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
28%
Price, $
$359.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
300
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |