The Core i9-12900F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7402 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $349.18 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i9-12900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 55% cheaper – $286.64 vs $635.82
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 24 threads
Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 7402
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
230
100%
Min 1% FPS
156
100%
Price, $
$286.64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 7402 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 7402 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 7402 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
30 MB
23%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-12900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7402 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
$494.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Alder Lake-S | Codename | Rome |
65 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
30 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |