Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $359.99 vs $485.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.69 vs $0.82 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-12900F - 593 vs 524 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
524
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$359.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1135 minutes ago
Buy for $485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1135 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |