In Atomfall, the Core i9-12900E is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900E
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 251 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900E vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900E vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900E vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900E
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
30 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900E Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$494.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
