In Atomfall, the Core i9-12900E is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-12900E
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-12900E vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$357.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-12900E vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-12900E vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-12900E
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
80%
L3 Cache
30 MB
91%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
89%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-12900E Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $494.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
