Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-11700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-11700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-11700F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 9% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-11700F - 255 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-11700F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $259.99 vs $412.00
- Up to 31% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900 - $1.11 vs $1.62 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $412 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3068 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$259.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3068 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900 | vs | Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |