In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-11900T is slower than the Xeon W3520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900T
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3520
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W3520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W3520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W3520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon W3520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $439.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
