In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900T is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900T
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 03, 2018
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
92%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
$439.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
