In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-11900T is slower than the FX-8320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900T
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8320
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900T vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900T vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900T vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $439.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
