In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$439.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
