In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i9-11900T is faster than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900T
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 115 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Celeron G1610
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900T vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
93 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
77%
Price, $
$48.51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900T vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900T vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $439.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
