In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 3600X. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $333 more expensive!
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 76% cheaper – $105.89 vs $439.00
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall – $0.49 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
26%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
94%
Price, $
$105.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
