In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
94%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
