In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 8% cheaper – $439.00 vs $476.00
- Up to 8% cheaper
- Up to 2% better value in Atomfall – $1.90 vs $1.94/FPS
- Up to 2% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
231 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
94%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
98%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$513.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
