Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $320.00 vs $463.58
- Up to 20% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-13900KF - $1.32 vs $1.66 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900KF - 279 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
242
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$320
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $320 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 421 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
80%
Price, $
$463.58
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $463.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 421 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |