In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900KF
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
217 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
