In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $109 more expensive!
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 25% cheaper – $329.95 vs $439.00
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 20% better value in Atomfall – $1.52 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 20% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
75%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
80%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
94%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
