In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $319 more expensive!
Core i9-11900KF
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 231 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 73% cheaper – $119.99 vs $439.00
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall – $0.57 vs $1.90/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
30%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
91%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KF vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $513.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
