In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-11900KB is slightly slower than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-11900KB
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – May 15, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5620
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900KB
May 15th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900KB May 15th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 15th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $539.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
