In Atomfall, the Core i9-11900K is faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $355 more expensive!
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 232 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 84% cheaper – $65.98 vs $420.99
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Atomfall – $0.32 vs $1.81/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
174 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.99
15%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
18%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
202 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
87%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $539.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
