In Deathloop, the Core i9-11900K is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 16% cheaper – $449.00 vs $534.00
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Deathloop – $1.95 vs $2.18/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Deathloop
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Jan 28, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-11900K vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
95%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
84%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
89%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900K vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900K vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 28th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 28th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 28th, 2025 |
$539.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
