The Core i9-11900 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8120 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $221.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-11900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8120
- Up to 74% cheaper – $78.02 vs $299.99
Core i9-11900 vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, $
$299.99
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
32%
Core i9-11900 vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-11900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$439.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |