Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-11900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 560 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-11900.
Advantages of Core i9-11900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900 - 220 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $259.52 vs $299.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900 - $1.18 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$259.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $259.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900 | vs | Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |