Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 130 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $149.95 vs $299.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900 - $1.23 vs $2.31 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
53%
Price, $
$299.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900 | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |