In Atomfall, the Core i9-10920X is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $567 more expensive!
Core i9-10920X
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $302.97 vs $869.95
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall – $1.25 vs $3.97/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-10920X vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$869.95
34%
Value, $/FPS
$3.97/FPS
31%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10920X vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10920X vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
58%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10920X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
