Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 1074 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - 160 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $197.00 vs $565.00
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - $1.23 vs $4.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 105 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |