In Deathloop, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $162 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 36% cheaper – $288.00 vs $449.98
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in Deathloop – $1.19 vs $2.02/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
92%
Price, $
$449.98
64%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
59%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
64%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
