In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10900X is same performance as the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $204 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
- Is 5 months and 26 days newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 months and 26 days newer
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 45% cheaper – $246.04 vs $449.98
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.43 vs $2.61/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
54%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
55%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
