In Control, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $147 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 33% cheaper – $302.97 vs $449.98
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 34% better value in Control – $1.19 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 34% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$449.98
67%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
66%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
58%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
