In Rust, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Core i7-12700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $206 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Core i7-12700F
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 258 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 46% cheaper – $244.99 vs $450.99
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Rust – $0.94 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-12700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
235 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
79%
Price, $
$450.99
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
49%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
258 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
77%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $324.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
