In Deathloop, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly faster than the Xeon E5620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Xeon E5620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Xeon E5620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Xeon E5620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
