Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 157 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3950X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3950X - 414 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $292.57 vs $485.95
- Up to 41% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.71 vs $1.20 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3950X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$292.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $292.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 420 minutes ago
Buy for $485.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 420 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |