Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $93.99 vs $249.00
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.49 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |